Evaluasi Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa Melalui Pembelajaran Metode Studi Kasus Pada Mata Kuliah Perkembangan Peserta Didik di Program Studi Pendidikan IPA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/venn.v5i4.490Abstract
Evaluating learning outcomes across different class types remains a critical yet underexplored issue in Indonesian higher education, particularly in science teacher preparation programs where pedagogical equity is essential. This study evaluates student learning outcomes in the Child Development (PPD) course using the case study learning method at the Science Education Study Program, Universitas Negeri Makassar, during the Even Semester of Academic Year 2025–2026. A descriptive-quantitative approach with comparative case study design was employed. Research subjects consisted of 98 students across three classes: ICP Class (n=29), Regular Class A (n=36), and Regular Class B (n=33). Analysis encompassed descriptive statistics (mean, median, SD, skewness, kurtosis, 95% CI), Shapiro-Wilk normality test, Levene homogeneity test, One-Way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis as non-parametric alternative, and Mann-Whitney post-hoc tests with Bonferroni correction. Descriptive results showed mean scores of 87.79 (SD=6.59) for ICP, 87.17 (SD=4.87) for Regular A, and 88.09 (SD=3.47) for Regular B. Shapiro-Wilk test indicated non-normal distributions across all classes (p<.001), warranting Kruskal-Wallis as the primary test, which revealed no significant inter-class differences (H=1.039, p=.595). This was corroborated by One-Way ANOVA (F(2,95)=0.301, p=.741, η²=.006), indicating a trivial effect size. Mann-Whitney post-hoc comparisons with Bonferroni correction found no significant pairwise differences (all p>.017). These findings imply that case study method implementation in PPD produced equivalent and consistent learning outcomes across all three classes, with a classical completion rate of 98.0% (grade ≥B+).
Downloads
References
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), 1–12.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans Green.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Coombs, W. T., & Algina, J. (1996). New test statistics for the one-way analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(3), 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164496056003002
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Findell, B., Swafford, J., & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
Grossman, P. L. (1992). Teaching and learning with cases: Unanswered questions. In J. H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education (pp. 227–239). Teachers College Press.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.
Merseth, K. K. (1996). Cases and case methods in teacher education. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 722–744). Macmillan.
Moss, C. M., & Brookhart, S. M. (2019). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom: A guide for instructional leaders (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Mulyasa, E. (2013). Pengembangan dan implementasi kurikulum 2013. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Papalia, D. E., & Feldman, R. D. (2012). Experience human development (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Popham, W. J. (2011). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (6th ed.). Pearson.
Santrock, J. W. (2011). Educational psychology (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Shulman, J. H. (1992). Case methods in teacher education. Teachers College Press.
Sudjana, N. (2016). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar (21st ed.). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (26th ed.). Alfabeta.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Widoyoko, E. P. (2014). Evaluasi program pembelajaran: Panduan praktis bagi pendidik dan calon pendidik. Pustaka Pelajar.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Salma Samputri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe on the rights of others).
- they agree to the license and copyright agreement.
All articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
