Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa pada Materi Persamaan Kuadrat

Authors

  • Farel Gusta Juyan Putra Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci, Indonesia
  • Eline Yanty Putri Nasution Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53696/venn.v5i4.567

Keywords:

Algebra, Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability, Polya’s Problem-Solving Stages, Problem-Solving Profile

Abstract

Mathematical problem-solving ability is an essential competency in mathematics learning because it enables students to analyze, plan, and solve mathematical problems systematically. However, many students still encounter difficulties in solving algebra problems, particularly in evaluating the correctness of their solutions. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the profile of students’ mathematical problem-solving ability in algebra based on Polya’s problem-solving stages. This study employed a descriptive qualitative research design. The population consisted of all SMA Negeri 2 Kerinci students, totaling 21 tenth-grade students as the research sample that was selected using a purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through a mathematical problem-solving test administered to all students, after which four students representing the categories of very good, good, fair, and poor were selected purposively for in-depth analysis. The instrument was tested for validity, reliability, item difficulty, discrimination index, and item correlation using SPSS. The results indicated that 9.52% of students were categorized as very good, 28.57% as good, 52.38% as fair, and 9.52% as poor. Based on Polya’s stages, students achieved 71.43% in understanding the problem, 85.71% in devising a plan, 66.67% in carrying out the plan, and 4.76% in looking back. The findings reveal that most students were able to understand problems, devise solution strategies, and carry out solution plans, whereas the looking-back stage remained the weakest aspect of their mathematical problem-solving profile. These findings imply that mathematics instruction should emphasize not only obtaining correct answers but also developing students’ habits of solving problems systematically and verifying their solutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aeni, T. N. (2024). Students’ errors in solving mathematical story problems based on Polya’s solution steps. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 3(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v3i1.1779

Aflah, T., Maimunah, M., & Roza, Y. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Berdasarkan Teori Polya dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Perbandingan. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah Di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.29407/jmen.v10i2.22784

Agustina, R., & Nurdiyanto, A. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMK Berdasarkan Tahapan Polya. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Lampung, 11(3), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.23960/mtk/v11i3.pp160-169

Arikunto, S. (2015). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Matematika. Aswaja Pressindo.

Asdamayanti, N., Nasution, E. Y. P., & Sari, M. (2023). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa madrasah aliyah pada materi SPLTV. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 1141-1152. https:/doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.2084

Aziz, A., Caswita, C., & Sutiarso, S. (2025). Efektivitas Open-ended Problem Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis: Kajian Literatur. Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal, 7, 461–478. https://doi.org/10.29303/jm.v7i2.7139

Damastuti, A. S., Triyanto, T., & Nurhasanah, F. (2023). Reflective Thinking Students with Different Adversity Quotients in Solving Mathematics Problems. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 7(4), 1128. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i4.16552

Erviana, E., Ningsih, Y. L., & Fitriasari, P. (2020). Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving Ability of Junior High School Students on Relation & Function Material with Polya’s Strategy. Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.26858/jdm.v8i3.15233

Fahrurrozi, F., & Hamdi, S. (2017). Metode Pembelajaran Matematika. Lombok Timur: Universitas Hamzanwadi Press. https://eprints.hamzanwadi.ac.id/587/1/MATEMATIKA%20FIX.pdf

Hernaeny, U., Simamora, L., & Prastiwi, S. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa SMK Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Melalui Google Form. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 7(4), 1791–1797. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i4.1596

Iilonga, H. K., & Ogbonnaya, U. (2024). Students’ ‘Looking Back’ in Solving Algebraic Word Problems. Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(01), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v14i01.29404

Mawaddah, M., Ramadhani, N., Faradillah, A., & Jusra, H. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Pattimura, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30598/snpmunpatti.2021.pp9-21

Natapratiwi, K., Mahayukti, G., & Mertasari, N. (2026). Implementasi Tahap Looking Back Menurut Polya Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa: Systematic Literature Review Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11, 555–572. https://doi.org/10.30605/2gk96t94

Neltiana, S., & Rusliah, N. (2026). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Mahasiswa dalam Mata Kuliah Statistik Matematika Berdasarkan Tipe Kepribadian Judging dan Perceiving. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 672–686. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v10i2.4910

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Patih, T., Herman, H., Haryati, H., Hadi, A. La, Riansyah, F., & Halistin, H. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Peserta Didik di Sekolah Dasar. Diniyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 5(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.31332/dy.v5i1.9352

Powell, S. R., Berry, K. A., & Benz, S. A. (2020). Analyzing the word-problem performance and strategies of students experiencing mathematics difficulty. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58, 100759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100759

Prayogi, A., Ridwan, M., Anita, A., & Mariana, S. (2026). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII MTS N 2 Sarolangun pada Materi Pecahan. GAUSS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30656/gauss.v9i1.12114

Santos-Trigo, M. (2024). Problem solving in mathematics education: tracing its foundations and current research-practice trends. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 56(2), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-024-01578-8

Setyawan, D. (2020). Proses Memeriksa Kembali Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Kontekstual Matematis Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar. MATHEdunesa, 9(2), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v9n2.p455-460

Tafari, N., Murni, A., & Roza, Y. (2024). Analysis Of Students’ Ability To Solve Mathematical Problems On Contextual Problems Involving Algebraic Forms. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 15(3), 491. https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v15i3.80590

Thomas, D., & Mahmud, M. S. (2021). Analysis of Students’ Error in Solving Quadratic Equations Using Newman’s Procedure. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 11, 2222–6990. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i12/11760

Yulia, P., & Nasution, E. Y. P. (2022). The Students' Mathematical Concept Understanding in Introductory Mathematics Course. Edumatika: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v5i1.990

Zhang, Y., Tian, H., & Lu, J. (2025). The relationship between higher-order thinking and problem-solving skills development among pre-service teachers using generative AI: an analysis based on moderated mediation. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 1094. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03404-6

Downloads

Published

19-07-2026

How to Cite

Putra, F. G. J., & Nasution, E. Y. P. (2026). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa pada Materi Persamaan Kuadrat . Venn: Journal of Sustainable Innovation on Education, Mathematics and Natural Sciences, 5(4), 914–923. https://doi.org/10.53696/venn.v5i4.567

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)