The Error Analysis Of Junior High School Students Based On Newman Procedure In Solving Numeration Problems Reviewing From Independent Learning
Error Analysis Of Junior High School Students Based On Newman Procedure In Solving Numeration Problems Reviewing From Independent Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/2964-867X.58Keywords:
Minimum Competency Assessment, Numeracy, Independent Learning, MistakeAbstract
The points of this review (1) are to figure out the most missteps made by understudies in settling the base ability evaluation numeracy questions, and (2) to figure out the elements that make understudies commit errors in addressing the base skill appraisal numeracy questions because of free learning, (3) to depict the mistakes. what understudies do is botches made by understudies with autonomous learning in taking care of AKM numeracy issues. In this study utilizing an illustrative strategy with a subjective methodology, the subjects in this study were educators and understudies. Information assortment methods utilized tests, meetings, surveys, and documentation from the educator and 6 understudies in the classification of High, Medium, and Low. Test methods, interview procedures, survey strategies. The aftereffects of this study are (1) the slip-ups made by understudies in addressing the AKM numeracy questions in light of free picking up, as per the educator, incorporating absence of comprehension of the material, absence of comprehension of inquiries, and understanding inquiries. (2) The missteps made in tackling the inquiries that most understudies make are mistakes in perusing the inquiries, grasping the inquiries, and abilities during the time spent addressing the AKM numeracy questions. (3) Learning autonomy influences the consequences of addressing the AKM numeracy questions that are finished, understudies with high classifications on test results have high learning freedom, and understudies who get low experimental outcomes are less autonomous in learning.
Downloads
References
Ananda, R. P., Sanapiah, S., & Yulianti, S. (2018). Error Analysis of Class VII Smpn 7 Mataram Students in Solving Lines and Angles Problems for the 2018/2019 Academic Year. Mathematics Education Media, 6(2), https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v6i2.1838
Afriansyah, E. A. (2018). Use of ATLAS.ti Software as a Process Tool for Qualitative Data Analysis. Mosharafa: Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(2), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v5i2.260
Autoridad Nacional del Servicio Civil. (2021). Error. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952.
Chyanovianty, A. D. (2020). Analysis of the Numerical Ability of Class VIII Students in Completing Minimum Competency Assessment Questions., 05(02), 1439–1448.
Fatahillah, A., & Wati, Y. F. (2017). Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Math Story Problems Based on Newman's Stages and the Form of Scaffolding Given. Kadikma Journal, 8(1), 40–51. http://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/kadikma/article/view/5229
Gufron, A. M., & Basir, M. A. (2021). Analysis of Student Errors in Completing the Numerical Literacy Ability Test Based on Newman's Analysis Error. Proceedings of the Sultan Agung Education National Seminar 2, 2(Sendiksa 2), 99–107.
Wahyu, S. U. (2013). Communication Skills and Mathematical Logical Thinking and Independent Learning. 2(1), 79–89.
Huda, N., & Kencana, A. G. (2013). Error analysis of students based on understanding ability in solving story problems on cube and block material in class VIII SMP Negeri 30 Muaro Jambi. Semirata Proceedings of FMIPA Lampung, 1,595–606.
Jannah, D. (2020). Problems and Solutions for Education in Indonesia Based on PISA Assessment. 190721637646.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2020). AKM and its Implications for Learning. Center for Assessment and Learning, Research and Development Agency and Books, Ministry of Education and Culture.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2021). National Assessment: Question and Answer Sheet. Ministry of Education and Culture, 1–32. https://hasilun.puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/akm/file_akm_202101_1.pdf
Layn, R., & Kahar, S. (2017). Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Math Story Problems. Journal of Math Educator Nusantara (JMEN), 03(02), 59–145.
Mediyani, D., & Mahtuum, Z. A. (2020). Analysis of student errors in solving statistical material problems for Class VIII Junior High School students. 1.2. 3(4), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i4.385-384
Nabillah, T., & Abadi, P. A. (2019). Factors Causing Low Student Learning Outcomes. Sesiomedika, 2(3), 659–663.
Ninla Elmawati Falabiba, Budget, W., Mayssara A. Abo Hassanin Supervised, A., Wiyono, B. ., Ninla Elmawati Falabiba, Zhang, Y. J., Li, Y., & Chen, X. (2014). Learning independence. Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents, 5(2), 40–51.
Rijal, S., & Bachtiar, S. (2015). The Relationship between Attitudes, Learning Independence, and Learning Styles with Students' Cognitive Learning Outcomes. Journal of Bioedukatika, 3(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v3i2.4149
Sidi, Jati, I. and B. (2003). Competency standards. City of publication: publisher.
Sumarni, C., & Sumarmo, U. (2016). Mathematical Reasoning and Independent Learning of Students. Educentric, 3(3), 290–299.
Tohir, M. (2019). Indonesia's PISA Results in 2018 are Lower than 2015. December 2019, 20–22. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/pcjvx
Wiriani, W. T. (2021). The Effect of Independent Learning on Student Learning Outcomes in Online Learning. 2(1), 57–63.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Diki Mulyana,S.Pd.,M.Pd Diki Mulyana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe on the rights of others).
- they agree to the license and copyright agreement.
All articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
