Literasi Numerik Mahasiswa Asal Papua Di Universitas Negeri Manado (Unima)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/venn.v5i5.617Keywords:
Numerical literacy, Papuan students, Higher education, Quantitative literacy, AAC&U rubricAbstract
Papuan students at Universitas Negeri Manado (UNIMA) have experienced difficulties in meeting academic expectations, as indicated by relatively low GPAs and class-attendance rates. Numerical literacy is essential for academic success and informed decision-making; therefore, understanding students’ numerical literacy is important for identifying areas requiring educational support. This study aimed to describe the numerical literacy abilities of Papuan students at UNIMA based on six indicators of the Quantitative Literacy VALUE Rubric developed by the Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U): interpretation, representation, calculation, analysis, assumptions, and communication. A descriptive quantitative approach was employed involving 20 Papuan students from four faculties and twelve study programs, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a numerical literacy test consisting of six contextual essay questions and analyzed through descriptive statistics, including mean scores, percentages, and proficiency-level classifications. The results showed that 47.5% of participants were at Level 1 (Benchmark), 30.0% at Level 2 (Milestone 1), 16.7% at Level 3 (Milestone 2), and 5.8% at Level 4 (Capstone). Calculation obtained the highest mean score (2.15), while assumptions had the lowest (1.60). Interpretation (1.85), analysis (1.75), and communication (1.85) were also relatively low. These findings indicate that students’ numerical literacy remains dominated by basic competencies, highlighting the need for learning strategies that strengthen critical thinking, analytical skills, and quantitative communication.
Downloads
References
Alifah, Y., & Abdullah, S. (2026). The Relationship student intake factors and first year academic performance in mathematics: a multivariate regression analysis. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 17(1), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v16i1.30127
Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2009). Quantitative Literacy VALUE Rubric. http://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/quantitative-literacy
Devita, D., & Rismaini, L. (2024). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Persamaan Linier Mahasiswa Manajemen. Journal of Education Research, 5(4), 5931–5939. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.1913
Fazariah, H., Hasanah, R. U., & Sari, R. P. (2024). Systematic literature review: Kesulitan belajar mahasiswa pendidikan matematika. Bilangan: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Kebumian Dan Angkasa, 2(3), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.62383/bilangan.v2i3.48
Harahap, M., & Ikhwan, I. (2020). Proses Adaptasi Mahasiswa Asal Papua di Universitas Negeri Padang (Studi pada Mahasiswa Asal Papua di Universitas Negeri Padang Program Pendidikan ADIK). Jurnal Perspektif, 3(2), 310–315. https://doi.org/10.24036/perspektif.v3i2.258
Harianto, Y., Saefudin, S., & Nuraeni, E. (2017). Analysis of students’ quantitative literacy in human coordination system concept. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), 440. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16764
Haridian, M. R., Nurcahyono, O. H., & Pranawa, S. (2019). Strategi Adaptasi Mahasiswa Asal Papua di Universitas Sebelas Maret. Indonesian Journal of Sociology, Education, and Development, 1(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.52483/ijsed.v1i2.14
Nadjamuddin, A., & Hulukati, E. (2022). Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(1), 987–996. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i1.1999
New Hampshire Quantitative Literacy Task Force. (2010). New Hampshire PreK-16 Numeracy Action Plan for the 21 st Century Governor of New Hampshire Executive Council New Hampshire State Board of Education Commissioner of Education. https://aisd2010numeracyplan.pbworks.com/f/Numeracy+NH_action_plan.pdf
Nurhaswinda, N., Rahman, A., Mahdi, M., Zahara, J., & Isamadola, I. (2025). Peran logika matematika dalam pemecahan masalah sehari-hari. Cahaya Pelita: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1(2), 56–60.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education, PISA. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en.
Qomariyah, S., & Rosyidah, U. (2022). Kesulitan Belajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Pada Mata Kuliah Analisis Real. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 8(2), 396–400. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i2.1865
Rach, S., & Ufer, S. (2020). Which Prior Mathematical Knowledge Is Necessary for Study Success in the University Study Entrance Phase? Results on a New Model of Knowledge Levels Based on a Reanalysis of Data from Existing Studies. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 6(3), 375–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-020-00112-x
Rahmaini, N., & Chandra, S. O. (2024). Pentingnya berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran matematika. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29303/griya.v4i1.420
Rizaldi, M., Pandiangan, P., & Hamdani, M. (2023). Literasi matematis mahasiswa dalam mengerjakan masalah kontekstual matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan, 24(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.52850/jpn.v24i1.8886
Safari, Y., & Nurhida, P. (2024). Pentingnya pemahaman konsep dasar matematika dalam pembelajaran matematika. Karimah Tauhid, 3(9), 9817–9824. https://doi.org/10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i9.14625
Simanullang, F. A. (2023). Strategi Adaptasi Culture Shock Mahasiswa Perantau Pada Mahasiswa Afirmasi Asal Papua Di Universitas Riau (Bachelor’s thesis, Universitas Riau). Universitas Riau.
Steen, L. A. (2001). Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy. NCED Princeton, NJ.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yemi Kogoya, Vivian Eleonora Regar, Rosauli Novalina Samosir, Ermita Ermita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe on the rights of others).
- they agree to the license and copyright agreement.
All articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
