Analisis Penerapan Assesment For Learning Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di SMP

Authors

  • Danial Danial Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Kalfin Kalfin Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Damar Rais Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53696/venn.v5i1.443

Keywords:

Assesment For Learning, Junior High School, Mathematics Instruction

Abstract

This study was motivated by the importance of implementing Assessment for Learning in mathematics instruction to support continuous monitoring of students’ learning progress, the provision of feedback, and the improvement of the learning process. The study aimed to analyze the implementation of Assessment for Learning in mathematics learning at SMP Negeri 5 Sinjai, particularly in the aspects of formative assessment, remedial teaching, feedback, and the follow-up use of assessment results in instructional planning. This study employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive research design. The research subjects were a mathematics teacher eighth-grade, while the data were collected through classroom observations and interviews. The data were analyzed using descriptive qualitative analysis through the stages of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings revealed that the teacher had implemented formative assessment in the form of quizzes, assignments, and daily assessments, which were adjusted to students’ characteristics and the cognitive level of the material. When the learning objectives were not achieved, the teacher conducted remedial teaching through reteaching, grouping students, and adjusting the level of difficulty of the assessment items. Feedback was provided in the form of scores and verbal responses, and its effectiveness was monitored through subsequent assessments. Assessment results were also used to improve teaching modules, assessment instruments, and instructional strategies. These findings indicate that Assessment for Learning plays an important role in creating mathematics instruction that is adaptive, reflective, and oriented toward students’ needs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akyuni, Q. (2013). Urgensi Reward Dalam Pendidikan. Serambi Tarbawi Studi Pemikiran,Riset Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 45–63.

Aliyah. (2024). Analisis Permasalahan dan Kebutuhan Pelatihan Guru dalam Mengimplementasikan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri, 01, 1–7.

Amalia, S. R. (2023). Pemanfaatan Alat Peraga Geoboard Berbasis Digital Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Belajar Matematika Pada Siswa Kelas V. Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 10, 181–201.

Arifin, S., Kartono, K., & Hidayah, I. (2019). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah pada model problem based learning disertai remedial teaching. Eduma: Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 85–97.

Astuti, D., Kartono, K., & Wardono, W. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Model Pembelajaran JUCAMA berpendekatan PMRI dengan Google Form sebagai Self Assessment. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 69–76.

Bagus, R. (2017). Kesulitan Menyimak dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia (Penelitian Studi Kasus Pada Siswa Kelas 3 Sekolah Dasar Inklusi X Bandung): listening: case studies: and auditory disorders. LITERASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia Dan Daerah, 7(1), 41–52.

Barana, A., Fissore, C., & Marchisio, M. (2020). From standardized assessment to automatic formative assessment for adaptive teaching. CSEDU 2020 - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, 1, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009577302850296

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325.

Fajrianti, S. N. (2021). Analisis Implementasi Penilaian Formatif di MTs Negeri Se-Jakarta Selatan. In Fisheries Research (Vol. 140, Issue 1).

Haryati, F. D., & Puspitaningrum, D. (2023). Implementasi Ice Breaking sebagai Pematik Motivasi Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Al-Ilmi: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.47435/al-ilmi.v4i1.2133

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

Huberman, M., & Miles, M. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher’s companion. sage.

Kirbani, K. (2013). Pengembangan Model Assessment For Learning (Afl) Melalui Penilaian Teman Sejawat Untuk Pembelajaran Matematika Pada Pokok Bahasan Persamaan Garis Lurus Di Madrasah Tsanawiyah Pondok Pesantren Modern Islam Assalaam Sukoharjo. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(2).

Lestari, A. D., Alghifari, R. I., & Zuhriyah, I. A. (2025). Pendekatan Komprehensif Terhadap Umpan Balik Dalam Evaluasi PAI: Antara CaPAIan, Refleksi, Dan Intervensi. Muróbbî: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(2), 331–347.

Munib, A. (2017). Penilaian Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. In Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta (Issue May).

Natalia, M., & Tangkin, W. P. (2022). Penggunaan Media Powerpoint Interaktif Untuk Meningkatkan Konsentrasi Belajar Siswa Kelas II SD. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 8(3), 1017–1025. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i3.2676

Panadero, E., Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: A roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1), 13–31.

Pendidikan, P. A. (2023). Perilisan hasil PISA 2022: Peringkat Indonesia naik 5-6 posisi. Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan, Badan Standar, Kurikulum, Dan Asesmen Pendidikan, Kemdikbudristek. https://pusmendik.kemdikbud.go.id/konten/perilisan-hasil-pisa-2022-peringkat-indonesia-naik-5-6-posisi

Pratiwi, D. D., & Kuswanto, C. W. (2021). Pengembangan Desain Rpp Dan Asessmen Hardskills Matematika Peserta Didik Tingkat Menengah Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 14(1), 99–112.

Purnawanto, A. T. (2022). Modul Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi. Mata Kuliah Inti Seminar Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 2.

Purnomo, Y. W. (2016). Perbaikan instruksional dalam implementasi assessment-based learning di kelas matematika. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXV, 3, 403–411.

Rakoczy, K., Pinger, P., Hochweber, J., Klieme, E., Schütze, B., & Besser, M. (2019). Formative assessment in mathematics: Mediated by feedback’s perceived usefulness and students’ self-efficacy. Learning and Instruction, 60, 154–165.

Ratnawulan, E., & Rusdiana, A. (2014). Evaluasi Pembelajaran.

Sahrandi, A., & Saparwadi, A. I. H. F. (2021). Aplikasi Remedial Teaching Dalam Kuratif Dan Preventif Problematika Belajar Siswa. Nidhomiyyah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 1–27.

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.

Downloads

Published

21-04-2026

How to Cite

Danial, D., Kalfin, K., & Rais, D. (2026). Analisis Penerapan Assesment For Learning Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di SMP. Venn: Journal of Sustainable Innovation on Education, Mathematics and Natural Sciences, 5(1), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.53696/venn.v5i1.443

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.