From quota reform to regime change: A comparative corpus-assisted discourse analysis of Bangladesh’s July Uprising
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.52285Keywords:
discourse analysis, July uprising, media coverage, quota reform, regime changeAbstract
In the rapidly shifting landscape of digital-era protest, Bangladesh’s July Uprising stands out as a pivotal moment where demands for quota reform evolved into a broader call for systemic transformation. Using the framework of Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS), this paper analyzes two corpora of 380 news reports comprising 332,259 tokens published by Prothom Alo and Jamuna Television between 1 July when the protest first came to public attention, and 5 August, the day the regime fell, thereby capturing the outlets’ full coverage of the event. The results reveal that Prothom Alo sustained an institutional, formal language of immediacy and confirmation, with temporal deixis such as “today” and “yesterday”, and lexical fields of bureaucratic justice: “quota reform movement”. Yet, with increasing state repression, its vocabulary gradually got to terms such as “arrest” and “tear gas” that indicated an escalating tension, reframing the protests as reverberations of authoritarian excess. Meanwhile, in a vocabulary abounding with urgency, resistance, and passion, Jamuna Television portrayed students as protesters but not just that, as torchbearers of a democratic movement. The terms like “Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina” turned into focal points, and “attack on protesters” pulled the narrative into a moral universe, foregrounding a regime-critical stance, where the state was no longer a neutral entity but a power to be addressed, challenged, and held to account.
Downloads
References
Akbar, T. (2018). Political quota for women and gender-equitable policies in Bangladesh. Antyajaa: Indian Journal of Women and Social Change, 3(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455632718778377
Al-Rawi, A. K. (2014). The Arab Spring and online protests in Iraq. International Journal of Communication, 8, 916-942.
Al-Zaman, M. S. (2020). Digital media and political communication in Bangladesh: A new wave of democratic and pluralistic politics? Artha-Journal of Social Sciences, 19(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.12726/ajss.53.1
Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.
Ara, F., & Northcote, J. (2020). Women’s participation in Bangladesh politics, the gender wall and quotas. South Asia Research, 40(2), 266-281.
Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., KhosraviNik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926508088962
Bayat, A. (2013). Life as politics: How ordinary people change the Middle East (2nd ed.). Stanford University Press.
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
Bhatia, M. V. (2005). Fighting words: Naming terrorists, bandits, rebels and other violent actors. Third World Quarterly, 26(1), 5-22.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Flowerdew, J. (2012). Discourse in English language education. Routledge.
Gerbaudo, P. (2017). The mask and the flag: Populism, citizenism, and global protest. Oxford University Press.
Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press.
Gunning, J., & Baron, I. Z. (2014). Why occupy a square? People, protests, and movements in the Egyptian revolution. Oxford University Press.
Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. SAGE.
Hossain, M. N., Rana, S., Sonia, A. K., & Amin, M. A. (2023). The quota reform movement in Bangladesh: Nationalist catalysts and impacts on Bangladesh-India relations. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5074850
Hunston, S. (2010). Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. Routledge.
Jackman, D. (2020). Students, movements, and the threat to authoritarianism in Bangladesh. Contemporary South Asia, 29(2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2020.1855113
Jasper, J. M. (2011). Emotions and social movements: Twenty years of theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 285-303. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150015
Khondker, H. H. (2011). Role of the new media in the Arab Spring. Globalizations, 8(5), 675-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2011.621287
Koopmans, R., & Olzak, S. (2004). Discursive opportunities and the evolution of right‐wing violence in Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 198-230. https://doi.org/10.1086/386271
Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. M. (2018). Media and protest logics in the digital era: The Umbrella Movement in Hong Kong. Oxford University Press.
Liaropoulos, D. A. N. (2022). Information as an instrument of power: Lessons learned from the war in Ukraine. NATO OPEN Publication, 7(6).
Lukin, A. (2019). War and its ideologies: a social-semiotic theory and description. Springer.
Mattoni, A., Berdnikovs, A., Ardizzoni, M., & Cox, L. (2010). Voices of dissent: Activists’ engagements in the creation of alternative, autonomous, radical and independent media. Interface: A Journal for and About Social Movements, 2(2), 1-22.
McAdam, D. (1982). Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. University of Chicago Press.
McCammon, H. J. (2012). The U.S. women’s jury movements and strategic adaptation: A more just verdict. Cambridge University Press.
Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge University Press.
Mishra, V. (2024, August 2). UNICEF reports 32 children killed, many injured and detained in Bangladesh protests. UN News. https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/08/1152796
Nasrin, S., & Rahman, M. M. (2019). Politicization of student politics in Bangladesh: Historical experiences and contemporary trends. Journal of Social Science Studies, 6(2), 17-42. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsss.v6i2.14385
Panday, P. K. (2008). Representation without participation: Quotas for women in Bangladesh. International Political Science Review, 29(4), 489-512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512108095724
Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Porta, D. D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements: An introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
Roy, R. K. (2019). Online activism, social movements and mediated politics in contemporary Bangladesh. Society and Culture in South Asia, 5(2), 193-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/2393861719836296
Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford University Press.
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (2005). Clarifying the relationship between framing and ideology. In H. Johnston, & J. A. Noakes (Eds.), Frames of protest: Social movements and the framing perspective (pp. 205-212). Rowman & Littlefield.
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133-155). Yale University Press.
Somma, N. M., Bargsted, M., Pavlic, R. D., & Medel, R. M. (2021). No water in the oasis: The Chilean Spring of 2019-2020. Social Movement Studies, 20(4), 495-502.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1727737
Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture. Blackwell.
Tanima, F. A., & George, S. (2025). Reclaiming resistance: A commentary on student movements, counter accounting, and the ousting of Sheikh Hasina’s autocratic regime in Bangladesh. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 45(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2025.2471302
Tanvir, F. A. (2023). Impact of school students’ politics in Bangladesh: Benefits and challenges. United International Journal for Research & Technology, 4(9), 77-91.
Tarrow, S. (2011). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
The Daily Star (2024, July 15). Clash breaks out between quota protesters, BCL activists at DU. https://www.thedailystar.net/news/bangladesh/news/clash-breaks-out-between-quota-protesters-bcl-activists-du-3657426
Tilly, C. (2004). Social movements, 1768-2004. Paradigm Publishers.
Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. SAGE.
Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak, & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63-94). SAGE.
Zainuddin, M., Islam, E., & Arif, I. (2025). From quota reform to regime collapse: Understanding the anti-discrimination movement in Bangladesh. Social Movement Studies, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2025.2512716
Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. Bloomsbury.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hasan Shaikh, Dr. Md. Obaidullah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe on the rights of others).
- they agree to license and copyright agreement.
All articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
