Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Metakognitif terhadap Kemandirian Belajar dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/venn.v5i1.413Keywords:
Metacognitive, Self-directed learning, Creative Thinking MathematicsAbstract
Self-directed learning and creative thinking are essential 21st-century skills that need to be optimally developed in mathematics education. This study aimed to investigate how the implementation of a metacognitive learning model influences students’ self-directed learning and creative thinking skills. A quasi-experimental design was employed involving ninth-grade students at SMP Telkom Makassar. The population comprised all ninth-grade students, with data collected using a self-directed learning questionnaire and a creative thinking skills test. In the experimental class, the mean self-directed learning score after the treatment was 3.59 with an average normalized gain of 0.48, and 100% of students achieved at least a moderate category. The mean creative thinking score reached 83.86 with an average gain of 0.77, and 90.3% of students exceeded the minimum mastery criterion. In contrast, the control class obtained a mean self-directed learning score of 3.39 with an average gain of 0.39, and 96.7% of students reached at least a moderate category. The mean creative thinking score in this class was 72.50 with an average gain of 0.61, and 56.7% of students surpassed the minimum mastery criterion. Inferential statistical analysis revealed that the metacognitive learning model had a significant effect on students’ self-directed learning and creative thinking. These findings underscore the importance of process-oriented mathematics instruction that emphasizes self-regulation and creativity. Therefore, metacognitive learning is recommended as an effective instructional strategy to enhance students’ learning independence and creative thinking skills.
Downloads
References
Arsyad, N. (2016). Model pembelajaran menumbuhkembangkan kemampuan metakognitif. Pustaka Refleksi.
Astutik, H. S., Rahman, A., & Djam’an, N. (2024). Pengaruh penerapan pembelajaran daring terhadap hasil belajar matematika ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar mahasiswa. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan IAIM Sinjai, 3, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.47435/sentikjar.v3i0.3909
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2
Djam’an, N., Bernard, & Sahid. (2021). Developing students’ creativity in building city mathematics through project-based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899(1), 012147. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012147
Djam’an, N., Asrawati, N., Sappaile, B. I., & Sidjara, S. (2023a). Development of a model of creative thinking based on mathematical literacy. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 21(4), 273–279.
Djam’an, N., Arwadi, F., & Amini, N. (2023b). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa ditinjau dari self-esteem. Issues in Mathematics Education, 7(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.35580/imed.v7i1.7577
Djam’an, N., Nasir, N. A., & Sahid. (2025a). The impact of the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) cooperative learning model on students’ engagement and mathematics achievement in powers and roots topics. Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 105–114. https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JDM/article/view/71975
Djam’an, N., Ashari, N. W., Saputra, A. A. S., Putri, F., Huriyah, A., & Ombi, N. D. (2025b). Efektivitas penerapan model inkuiri dengan pendekatan STEAM dan dukungan media Wordwall dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika. Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 638–652. https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v8i2.5872
Djam’an, N. (2025c). Examining the implementation of environmental education in the STEAM approach for sustainability. Discover Education, 4, Article 410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00837-4
Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinois.
Febdhizawati, E., Dwijayanti, R., & Nugroho, D. (2021). Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan dampaknya terhadap proses pembelajaran siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(1), 45–52.
Maor, R., Paz-Baruch, N., Grinshpan, N., Milman, A., Mevarech, Z., Levi, R., Shlomo, S., & Zion, M. (2023). Relationships between metacognition, creativity, and critical thinking in self-reported teaching performances in project-based learning settings. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101425
Mahera, U., Fonna, M., Wulandari, W., Fajriana, F., & Isfayani, E. (2022). Penerapan pendekatan pembelajaran metakognitif berbasis soft skill untuk meningkatkan kemandirian belajar siswa di MTsS Jabal Nur Dewantara. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Malikussaleh, 2(2), 307–315.
Masythoh, D. N., & Nuriadin, I. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis peserta didik ditinjau dari gender dalam pembelajaran daring pada masa Covid-19 di SMK. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 1750–1756.
Munandar, U. (1999). Pengembangan kreativitas anak berbakat. Rineka Cipta.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM
Notoatmodjo, S. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kesehatan. Rineka Cipta.
OECD. (2024). Future of education and skills 2030/2040. https://www.oecd.org/en/about/projects/future-of-education-and-skills-2030.html
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Ola, S. I., Idris, R., & Baharuddin. (2019). Pengaruh kemandirian dan gaya belajar terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa. Alauddin Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 49–56.
Leikin, R., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2013). Creativity and mathematics education: The state of the art. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0459-1
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2019). 21st century skills standards: A guide to integrating 21st century skills.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
Rahman, A., Sukarna, & Putra, M. H. D. (2023). The effect of implementing the learning model to develop metacognitive ability (PMKM) on learning outcomes and learning independence of ninth grade junior high school mathematics students. SAINSMAT: Journal of Applied Sciences, Mathematics, and Its Education, 12(1), 21–29.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Siswono, T. Y. E. (2011). Level of students’ creative thinking in classroom mathematics. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(7), 548–553.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
UNESCO. (2017). Learning to transform the world: Key competencies in education for sustainable development. UNESCO.
World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
Zubaidah, S. (2016). Keterampilan abad 21: Keterampilan yang diperlukan untuk sukses. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 1(1), 1–17.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurdin Arsyad, Nurwati Djam'an, Firda Amelia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe on the rights of others).
- they agree to the license and copyright agreement.
All articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
