Analisis Gesture Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Geometri secara Berkelompok Ditinjau dari Tahapan Berpikir Van Hiele

Authors

  • Usman Mulbar Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Rosidah Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Sahid Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Mar Athul Wazithah T. Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53696/venn.v5i1.435

Keywords:

Mathematical literacy, problem-solving strategies, student creativity, mathematical ability, contextual learning

Abstract

This study addresses the problem of students’ low mathematical literacy, particularly in relation to problem-solving strategies and creativity in solving contextual mathematical tasks. The research aims to describe students’ problem-solving strategies and creativity based on their levels of mathematical ability in solving mathematical literacy problems. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach involving six seventh-grade junior high school students selected through purposive sampling and categorized into high, intermediate, and low mathematical ability groups. Data were collected through mathematical literacy tests and semi-structured interviews, then analyzed using indicators of creativity (fluency, flexibility, and novelty) and problem-solving strategies. The findings reveal that high-ability students fulfilled all three creativity indicators by applying varied, appropriate, and original strategies. Intermediate-ability students generally achieved two indicators, mainly fluency and flexibility or fluency and novelty, but showed limitations in consistently demonstrating all aspects of creativity. In contrast, low-ability students struggled to understand contextual problems, selected inappropriate strategies, and did not meet any of the creativity indicators. The discussion highlights that mathematical ability strongly influences students’ strategic behavior and creative performance in solving literacy-based problems. In conclusion, students’ problem-solving strategies and creativity are proportional to their mathematical ability levels. Therefore, instructional practices that explicitly promote diverse strategies and creative thinking are essential to enhance students’ mathematical literacy skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2011). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Educational Psychology Review, 23(2), 247–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9177-z

Ansya, D. (2023). Pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis kolaborasi terhadap prestasi belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran.

Aries, T., et al. (2024). Analisis tahapan berpikir Van Hiele dalam pemecahan masalah geometri siswa SMP. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika.

Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307–359. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_2

Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.38.1.0069

Clements, D. H. (2014). Learning and teaching geometry. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 34, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.02.002

Goldin-Meadow, S., et al. (2014). Gestures and learning: A window into the learner’s mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1634). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0430

Lokollo, A., et al. (2023). Tantangan kemampuan berpikir spasial siswa dalam pembelajaran geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika.

Lorenza, R., & Imamuddin, M. (2023). Gesture representasional siswa dalam pemecahan masalah geometri. Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika.

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226178252.001.0001

Mukarromah, S., et al. (2024). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Nusantara.

Naja, F., et al. (2021). Analisis tahapan berpikir Van Hiele pada siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia.

Puspitasari, T., et al. (2024). Peran gesture dalam strategi penyelesaian masalah matematika. Advances in Mathematics Education.

Ristanty, P., & Pratama, R. (2022). Kesulitan siswa dalam pemecahan masalah geometri. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika.

Riyadi, R., & Supriatna, A. (2025). Hambatan komunikasi matematis siswa dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Nasional.

Sagita, R., & Hendriana, A. (2021). Penggunaan gesture dalam pemecahan masalah geometri siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpm.089.12

Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499944

Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1092-6

Wahyudi, H., et al. (2023). Argumentasi matematis siswa dalam pembelajaran kooperatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Akasia.

Zulmaulida, N. (2024). Matematika sebagai sarana berpikir logis dan sistematis. Jurnal Sigma Matematika.

Downloads

Published

10-04-2026

How to Cite

Mulbar, U., Rosidah, Sahid, & Wazithah T., M. A. (2026). Analisis Gesture Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Geometri secara Berkelompok Ditinjau dari Tahapan Berpikir Van Hiele. Venn: Journal of Sustainable Innovation on Education, Mathematics and Natural Sciences, 5(1), 198–209. https://doi.org/10.53696/venn.v5i1.435

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.