Code-Switching and Slang: An Analysis of Language Dynamics in the Everyday Lives of Generation Z
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.41127Keywords:
Code-switching, Gen-Z, Language Dynamics, SlangAbstract
This study explores the dynamics of code-switching used in Generation Z’s (Gen-Z) communication practices, revealing it as a dynamic and adaptive strategy employed in diverse social contexts. Gen-Z exhibits context-specific types of code-switching, utilizing informal and casual forms, such as slang and non-formal language, in peer interactions. Within familial settings, a seamless transition between formal and informal language aligns with established family norms, while professional environments witness the use of formal and professional language. The strategic use of code-switching and slang by Gen-Z serves as a nuanced communication approach, catering to specific social scenarios. In informal peer contexts, the incorporation of slang fosters a sense of camaraderie, while code-switching acts as a tool for expressing emotions and personal identity, reflecting individuals’ comfort in conveying specific feelings or ideas in a chosen language. This research contributes to a comprehensive understanding of Gen-Z’s language practices, showcasing their adeptness in navigating diverse linguistic landscapes, expressing identity, and adapting to social expectations. Such insights are pivotal for fostering effective intergenerational and cross-cultural communication, bridging understanding between different linguistic and cultural groups.
Downloads
References
Ajmain, T. (2020). Impacts and Effective Communication on Generation Z in Industrial Revolution 4.0 Era. Jetal: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistic, 2(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.36655/jetal.v2i1.204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36655/jetal.v2i1.204
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881
Ami, A. M. N., Putri, C. D., Lubis, F., Lestari, N. I., Nababan, S. F., Saragih, S. H., & Sari, S. D. (2023). Faktor-Faktor yang Membuat Maraknya Penggunaan Bahasa Asing maupun Bahasa Gaul di Kalangan Anak Muda. Morfologi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya, 1(4).
Apdillah, D., Salam, A., Tania, I., & Lubis, L. K. A. (2022). Optimizing Communication Ethics in the Digital Age. Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Business (JHSSB), 1(3), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.55047/jhssb.v1i3.143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55047/jhssb.v1i3.143
Ariffin, K., & Rafik-Galea, S. (2009). Code-Switching as a Communication Device in Conversation. Language & Society, 5(9).
Azlan, N. M. N. I., & Narasuman, S. (2013). The Role of Code-switching as a Communicative Tool in an ESL Teacher Education Classroom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.115
De Fina, A. (2007). Code-switching and the Construction of Ethnic Identity in a Community of Practice. Language in Society, 36(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070182
De Socarraz-Novoa, A. (2015). Code-Switching in a Multilingual Workplace. Journal for Undergraduate Ethnography, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.15273/jue.v5i1.8261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15273/jue.v5i1.8261
Demir, B., & Sönmez, G. (2021). Generation Z Students’ Expectations from English Language Instruction. Dil ve Dilbilimi Çalışmaları Dergisi, 17(1), 683–701. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.903536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.903536
Denny, E., & Weckesser, A. (2022). How to Do Qualitative Research? BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 129(7), 1166–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17150 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17150
Eberwein, T., & Porlezza, C. (2016). Both Sides of the Story: Communication Ethics in Mediatized Worlds. Journal of Communication, 66(2), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12216
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
Haviland, J. B. (2013). The Emerging Grammar of Nouns in a First Generation Sign Language. Gesture, 13(3), 309–353. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.04hav DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.04hav
Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
Jeresano, E. M., & Carretero, M. D. (2022). Digital Culture and Social Media Slang of Gen Z. United International Journal for Research & Technology (UIJRT), 3(4), 11–25.
Kandiawan, A. B. (2022). Code-switching and Slang Used by Gen Z Indonesians on Social Media. ELTR Journal, 7(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.37147/eltr.v7i1.165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37147/eltr.v7i1.165
Kemparaj, U., & Chavan, S. (2013). Qualitative Research: A Brief Description. Indian Journal of Medical Sciences, 67(3), 89. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5359.121127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5359.121127
Kramsch, C., & Widdowson, H. G. (1998). Language and Culture. Oxford University Press.
Kristanto, J., & Meilasari, P. (2019). Reasons for Social Media Users’ Code Switch Indonesian Teenagers Perspective. Proceedings of the UNNES International Conference on English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation (ELTLT 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/eltlt-18.2019.71 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/eltlt-18.2019.71
Lichtman, M. (2014). Qualitative Research for the Social Sciences. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544307756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544307756
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2015). Halliday on Language. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), The Bloomsbury Companion to M.A.K. Halliday (pp. 137–202). Bloomsbury.
Nilep, C. (2006). “Code Switching” in Sociocultural Linguistics. Colorado Research in Linguistics, 19.
Nuraeni, F. W., & Pahamzah, J. (2021). An Analysis of Slang Language Used in the Teenager Interaction. Litera, 20(2), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v20i2.37058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v20i2.37058
Panhwar, F. Y. (2020). Functions of Code-Switching in a Private Chat on Facebook. Journal of English Language, Literature and Education, 1(04), 16. https://doi.org/10.54692/jelle.2020.01045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54692/jelle.2020.01045
Pei, Z., Sun, Z., & Xu, Y. (2019). Slang Detection and Identification. Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), 881–889. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/K19-1082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/K19-1082
Piantari, L. L. (2011). Alih Kode (Code-Switching) pada Status Jejaring Sosial Facebook Mahasiswa. Jurnal Al-Azhar Indonesia Seri Humaniora, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.36722/sh.v1i1.19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36722/sh.v1i1.19
Pimentel, A. do S. G., & Diniz, C. da P. S. (2014). Language Used in Social Networks: Creativity and Self-Expression. Psychology, 05(19), 2131–2137. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.519215 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.519215
Sale, J. E. M., & Thielke, S. (2018). Qualitative Research is a Fundamental Sientific Process. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 102, 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.04.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.04.024
Schilhab, T. S. S. (2015). Words as Cultivators of Others Minds. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01690
Shay, O. (2015). To Switch or Not to Switch: Code-switching in a Multilingual Country. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209, 462–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.253
Sitaram, S., Chandu, K. R., Rallabandi, S. K., & Black, A. W. (2020). A Survey of Code-switched Speech and Language Processing. Computer Speech and Language.
Sophocleous, A. (2012). Switching Code and Changing Social Identities in Face-to-face Interaction. Sociolinguistic Studies, 5(2), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v5i2.201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v5i2.201
Stiles, W. B. (2003). Qualitative Research: Evaluating the Process and the Product. In Handbook of Clinical Health Psychology (pp. 477–499). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013389.ch24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013389.ch24
Syahputra, P. S., & Syafitri, D. (2022). Slang Words Analysis in the Movie Ralph Breaks the Internet. Edulia: English Education, Linguistic and Art Journal, 2(2), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.31539/edulia.v2i2.3939 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31539/edulia.v2i2.3939
Tarihoran, N., Fachriyah, E., Tressyalina, & Sumirat, I. R. (2022). The Impact of Social Media on the Use of Code Mixing by Generation Z. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 16(07), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i07.27659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i07.27659
Themistocleous, C. (2015). Digital Code-switching between Cypriot and Standard Greek: Performance and Identity Play Online. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(3), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913512727 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913512727
Unamuno, V. (2008). Multilingual Switch in Peer Classroom Interaction. Linguistics and Education, 19(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.01.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.01.002
Yule, G. (2022). The Study of Language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009233446 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009233446
Yusuf, Y. Q., Fata, I. A., & Aini, R. (2023). “Gotchuu!”: The Use of Slang in Social Media by Generation Z. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 17(2), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v17i2.17756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v17i2.17756
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vinka Ganita Puspita, Ardik Ardianto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe on the rights of others).
- they agree to license and copyright agreement.
All articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
