Rhetorical move structure of applied linguistics research abstracts across Sinta journal rankings

Authors

  • Zalinda Salsabilla Firdausyiah Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
  • Ni Gusti Ayu Roselani Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.52328

Keywords:

abstract, genre analysis, rhetorical pattern, rhetorical structure, move analysis

Abstract

The scholarly publishing scene is familiar with databases where scholars can look up for journal list and rankings. The said rankings lead to the assumption that research articles from higher-ranking journals have better quality than those from lower-ranking journals. This study aims to see the correlation between journal rankings and publication quality by analyzing the rhetorical moves of abstracts from journals across Science and Technology Index (SINTA) rankings. This study utilized Hyland’s five-move model as the framework to analyze 40 research abstracts from two groups, SINTA 1 and SINTA 4 applied linguistics research abstracts. The analysis revealed that the abstracts from both journals exhibited similar usage of moves, where Introduction, Methodology and Product has high number of occurrences across the data. However, the dominant rhetorical structure pattern of the abstracts differs between the two groups. To conclude, while SINTA rankings do not affect the realization of the moves, it seems to impact the rhetorical structure of the abstracts to a degree. This implies that journals across different SINTA indexes may apply different criteria for the research articles they publish.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Najhi, A., & Samaha, H. (2023). Capture to Communicate: Rhetorical Move 1 in the Abstracts of Hard and Soft Science Post-Graduate Dissertations (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4593920). Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4593920

Al-Zubi, D., & Fareh, S. (2023). English and Arabic abstracts in medical research articles: A contrastive study. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(2), 2273602. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2273602

Amnuai, W. (2019). Analyses of Rhetorical Moves and Linguistic Realizations in Accounting Research Article Abstracts Published in International and Thai-Based Journals. Sage Open, 9(1), 2158244018822384. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822384

Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315844992

Cross, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). A genre analysis of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation, 62(4), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610700953

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.

Firdausyiah, Z. S., Hermawan, B., & Muniroh, D. D. (2021). An Analysis of Rhetorical Move and Translation Techniques in Undergraduate Thesis Abstracts Written in Two Languages. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature), 6(2), 290–306.

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing (Michigan classics ed). University of Michigan Press.

Indonesian Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. (n.d.). SINTA - Science and Technology Index [Portal]. Retrieved January 14, 2025, from https://sinta.kemdikbud.go.id/

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003

Khany, R., & Malmir, B. (2020). A Move-marker List: A Study of Rhetorical Move-lexis Linguistic Realizations of Research Article Abstracts in Social and Behavioural Sciences. RELC Journal, 51(3), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219833131

Khedri, M. (2022). ‘This study aims to …’: Connecting metadiscoursal features and rhetorical moves in research article introductions across two disciplines. International Review of Pragmatics, 14(1), 45–76. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01401002

Koltay, T. (2010). Abstracts and abstracting: A genre and set of skills for the twenty-first century. Chandos.

Kurniawan, E., Lubis, A. H., Suherdi, D., & Danuwijaya, A. A. (2019). Rhetorical Organization of Applied Linguistics Abstracts: Does Scopus Journal Quartile Matter? GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 19(4), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2019-1904-10

Kurniawan, E., Nabilla, S. N., & Mauludini, Y. R. (2024). Introduction in Social Science Research Articles by Indonesian Authors: A Comparative Move Analysis. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 27(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v27i1.8191

Li, X. (2020). Mediating cross-cultural differences in research article rhetorical moves in academic translation: A pilot corpus-based study of abstracts. Lingua, 238, 102795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102795

Liu, L., & Jiang, F. (Kevin). (2024). Podcasting science: Rhetorical moves and interactional metadiscourse in the Nature Podcast. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 71, 101419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101419

Nabilla, S., Kurniawan, E., & Gunawan, W. (2021). Rhetorical move structure of soft and hard science research article introductions by novice Indonesian authors. Bahasa Dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Pengajarannya, 49(2). https://doi.org/10.17977/um015v49i22021p135

Pongracz, P., & Camerlink, I. (2023). Your message in pictures–Adding a graphical abstract to your paper. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 263, 105946.

Putri, T. D., & Kurniawan, E. (2021). Rhetorical Move and Genre Knowledge Development in Local and International Graduates’ Thesis and Dissertation Abstracts. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 24(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v24i2.3433

Ramadhini, T. M., Gunawan, W., & Muniroh, D. D. (2021). Rhetorical moves and genre development analysis of hard science field abstracts. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 21(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v21i2.44631

SCImago. (2024). Media Rankings. SCImago Media Rankings. https://www.scimagomedia.com/rankings.php?country=Indonesia&edition=2024_03

Tocalo, A. W. I. (2021). Move Structures and Their Rhetorical Verbs of Research Article Abstracts Across Englishes. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i1.34593

Ye, Y. (2021). From abstracts to “60-second science” podcasts: Reformulation of scientific discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53, 101025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101025

Yoon, J., & Casal, J. E. (2020). Rhetorical structure, sequence, and variation: A step-driven move analysis of applied linguistics conference abstracts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 462–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12300

Downloads

Published

25-08-2025

How to Cite

Firdausyiah, Z. S., & Roselani, N. G. A. (2025). Rhetorical move structure of applied linguistics research abstracts across Sinta journal rankings. Linguistics Initiative, 5(2), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.52328

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.