Ideological Underpinnings in President John Dramani Mahama’s 2013 State of the Nation Address
A Critical Discourse Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.17Keywords:
ideologies, critical discourse analysis, state of the nation addressAbstract
This study sets out to investigate, examine and understand the hidden ideologies and ideological structures/devices in the 2013 State of the Nation Address of President John Dramani Mahama. The study specifically aimed to (i) ascertain the ideologies embedded in the speech and (ii) investigate linguistic expressions and devices which carry these ideological colourations in the speech under review. It uses Critical Discourse Analysis as the theoretical framework to examine the role of language in creating ideology as well as the ideological structures in the speech. These hidden ideologies are created, enacted and legitimated by the application of certain linguistic devices. The researchers deem a study of this nature important as it will expose hidden motives that Ghanaian presidents cloth in language in order to manipulate their audience through their speeches in order to win and/or sustain political power. Through thematic analysis, it was revealed that Mahama projected these ideologies in his speech: ideology of positive self-representation, ideology of human value, ideology of economic difficulty, ideology of power relations and ideology of urgency. It also revealed that Mahama projects his ideologies through the following ideological discursive structures: pronouns, biblical allusion and metaphor. The study has shown that language plays a crucial role in human existence as a means of socialisation. Language has been revealed as a means of communicating ideologies and events of the world. In the tradition of CDA, this study has confirmed that text and talk have social and cultural character and that discourse functions ideologically.
Downloads
References
Abdulwahid, Y. (2011). Metaphors and their morality implications in political speeches: A pragmatic study. Faculty of Education Journal, 2(4).
Ademilokum A. M (2015). Discursive Strategies in Selected Political Rally Campaigns of 2011 Elections in Southwestern Nigeria. Internal Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 2(2), 120–132.
Al-Haq, F.A & Al-Sleibi, N.M.Y (2015). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Three Speeches of King Abdullah II. US-China Foreign Language, 13(5), 317-332. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8080/2015.05.001
Crystal, D. (1994). An encyclopedic dictionary of language and languages. Oxford: Blackwell.
Dadugblor, S. K. (2016). Clusivity in Presidential Discourse: A Rhetorical Discourse Analysis of State of the Nation Addresses in Ghana. A Published Master’s thesis Michigan University, Michigan
Darko, O. R. (2016). ‘Analysis of two Speeches by Osagyefo Dr. Kwame Nkrumah: Applying Interpersonal Metafunction of Systemic Functional Grammar’. A published master’s thesis, Department of English, University of Ghana, Legon.
Djabetey, I. N. (2013). Language, power, and ideology: A critical Discourse Analysis of selected speeches of Nana Addo Dankwa Akuffo-Addo and John Dramani Mahama. A published M.Phil. thesis, Department of English, University of Ghana, Legon.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992a). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity press.
Fairclough N. (1992b). Linguistic and Intertextual Analysis within Discourse Analysis. Discourse society, 3. 193-217.
Fairclough, N. (1992c). Critical Language Awareness. London: Longman.
Flowerdew, J. (2013). Discourse in English Language Education. New York and Canada: Routledge
Fowler, R. (1991). Critical Linguistics. In K. Halmkjaer (ed.). The Linguistic Encyclopaedia. London: Routledge. pp 89-93.
Gameli, K. R., & Angmorteh, P. M. (2016). Analysis of the Persuasive Strategies in the 2016 state of the Nation’s Address. International Journal of Innovative Research in Education, Technology, and Social Strategies, 3(1).
Gyawali, Y.P. (2020). Ideological interaction theory in critical discourse analysis. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93366
Hodge, R., & Kress, B. G. (1988) Social Semiotic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Kress, G. & Hodge, B. (1979) Language and Ideology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Lakoff, G. & Mark, J. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lawan, H. M. (2016). A Critical Discourse of Metaphor in Selected Acceptance and Inaugural Speeches of Presidents Goodluck Jonathan and Barack Obama. Retrieved from kubanni.abu.ng/jspuri/critical discourse analysis
Marianne, J. & Louise, J. P. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage Publications.
Mullet, D. R. (2018). A general critical discourse analysis framework for educational research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 29(2), 116-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18758260
Nuolija, R., & Tiittula, A. (2011). Irony in political television debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 572-587.
Schieble, M. (2012). A Critical discourse analysis of teachers’ views on LGBT literature. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 33, 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.620758
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis. Journal of Japanese Discourse, 1, pp. 17-27.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage Publication.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and Manipulations. Discourse and Society, 17(2), 359 – 383.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? In Blommaert, J. & Blucaen, C. (eds) Political Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 11-52.
Wodak. R. (1989). Language, Power and Ideology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Kojo Fenyi, Georgina Afeafa Sapaty
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe on the rights of others).
- they agree to license and copyright agreement.
All articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
