National identity construction through grammatical cohesive devices in independence day speeches in Ghana: A corpus-based study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.61401Keywords:
corpus-based study, independence day speeches, national identityAbstract
The construction of national identities in post-colonial nations is significantly influenced by political discourse, as political leaders use language to shape and reinforce a sense of collective identity. In this context, Ghana provides a compelling case for examining how grammatical cohesive devices in Independence Day Speeches contribute to national identity formation. This study employs a corpus-based approach, focusing on Ghana’s Independence Day speeches delivered by various presidents from 2010 to 2024, to capture trends across successive administrations. Drawing on Social Identity theory and Theory of Cohesion, this study examines how references to Ghana’s political past, present, and future contribute to the formation of a unified national identity. The findings indicate that demonstratives are the most dominant grammatical cohesive devices employed by Ghanaian presidents. These demonstratives mostly describe events, people and actions pertinent to the national narrative. One noteworthy finding is the use of the additive conjunction ‘and’, which serves a dual function: it links ideas linguistically while also creating contrast within discourse. This dual role enhances the effectiveness of the speeches. These findings highlight the crucial role of cohesive devices in reinforcing a shared national identity and fostering solidarity among the populace.
Downloads
References
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2010). Social identity and self-categorisation. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination (pp. 179-193). London: Sage.
Adukpo, J. (2017). An analysis of register and lexical cohesion in a selected political manifesto in Ghana. Unpublished master's dissertation, University of Education, Winneba.
Ahwireng, F. (2017). The Use of Cohesive Devices in Political Discourse in the 2016 State-of-the-Nation Address in Ghana. Unpublished Master's dissertation, University of Education, Winneba.
Alameda Hernández, Á. (2008). Discursive strategies in the construction of national identity: A critical discourse analysis of the Gibraltar issue in the printed media. National Identities, 10(2), 225-235.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso Books.
Asilevi, F. (2011). Introduction to Sociolinguistics and Pragmatics. Winneba: Institute for Educational Development and Extension.
Baker, P. (2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. New York: Continuum Publishing.
Bloom, W. (1990). Personal identity, national identity and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, H. C., & Holt, R. (2009). Taiwan and ROC: A critical analysis of President Chen Shui-bien's construction of Taiwan identity in national speeches. National Identities, 11(3), 301-330.
Conway, B. (2006). Who do we think we are? Immigration and the discursive construction of national identity in an Irish daily mainstream newspaper, 1996-2004. Translocations: The Irish Migration, Race and Social Transformation Review, 1(1), 76-94.
Crisp, R. J., & Hewstone, M. (2007). Multiple social categorisation. Advances in experimental social psychology, 39, 163-254.
De Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & society, 10(2), 149-173.
Deng, F. M. (1995). War of Visions: Conflict of Identities in the Sudan. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Dorvlo, K. (2011). Language Use in Education in Minority Language Areas: The Case of Logba. In H. Lauer, N.A.A. Amfo, & J. A. Anderson (Eds.), Identity Meets Nationality: Voices from the Humanities, (pp. 100-110). Accra, Ghana: Sub-Saharan Publishers.
Edu-Buandoh, D. (2016). Identity and representation through language in Ghana: The postcolonial self and the other. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 4(1), 34-44.
Edu-Buandoh, D. F., & Nkansah, N. B. (2018). National identity construction in independence day speeches of Anglophone West Africa. Journal of Pan African Studies, 12(1), 250-272.
Emilinda, S. (2022). The Analysis of Cohesive Devices in Donald Trump's Concession Speech Transcripts. Scripta: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 4(2), 135-145.
Fearon, J. D. (1999). Why Ethnic Politics and `Pork' Tend to Go Together. Mimeo: Stanford University.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. New York: Longman Group Ltd.
Hogg, M. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. European review of social psychology, 4(1), 85-111.
Hogg, M. A. (2015). Constructive leadership across groups: How leaders can combat prejudice and conflict between subgroups. Advances in group processes, 32(1), 177-207. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0882-614520150000032007
Hogg, M. & Abrams, D. (1988). Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. London: Routledge.
Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 143-156.
Israel, C. P. & Okoh, H. (2018). Advanced Composition. Winneba: Institute for Educational Development and Extension.
Jenkins, R. (1996). Social Identity. London: Routledge.
Kenix, L. J. (2015). You are either with us or with us: Constructing a Samoan national identity through inclusion at the Samoa Observer. Journalism, 16(4), 553-570.
Kennedy, G. D. (1998). An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. New York: Pearson Education Limited.
Kowert, P. & Legro, J. (1996). Norms, Identity, and Their Limits. In P. Katzenstein (Ed.), The Culture of National Security (pp. 451-497). New York: Columbia University Press.
McEnery, T. & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moronfoye, T. O. (2021). A Critical Analysis of President Muhammadu Buhari's Independence Day Speeches. Unpublished master's dissertation, Kwara State University, Nigeria.
Ngula, R. S. (2017). Corpus Methods in Language Studies. In D.D. Kuupole (Ed.), Perspectives on conducting and reporting research in the Humanities (pp. 205-223). Cape Coast, Ghana: University of Cape Coast Press.
Odogwu, C. N., & Akpojisheri, M. (2018). Pragmatic Acts in President Muhammadu Buhari’ s Independence Day Speech of October 1, 2017. NIU Journal of Humanities, 3(3), 105-114.
Romāne-Kalniņa, L. (2022). Construction and representation of national identity in the speeches of the presidents of the Baltic states: corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Latvia.
Saah, K. K. & Baku, K. (2011). Do not Rob us of Ourselves: Language and Nationalism in Colonial Ghana. In H. Lauer, N.A.A. Amfo, & J. A. Anderson (Eds.), Identity Meets Nationality: Voices from the Humanities, (pp. 74-99). Accra, Ghana: Sub-Saharan Publishers.
Sarfo-Kantankah, K. S. (2021). I withdraw and apologise but…: Ghanaian parliamentary apologies, the issue of sincerity and acceptance. Journal of Pragmatics, 180, 1-14.
Sherzer, A. (2020). The Jewish past and the ‘birth’of the Israeli nation state: the case of Ben-Gurion’s Independence Day speeches. Middle Eastern Studies, 57(2), 310-326.
Tafuli, Y. K. E., Bustan, F., & Haan, J. W. (2023). Grammatical Cohesive Devices in Joko Widodo’s Speech Text. Academic Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(1), 32-40.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). California, USA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorisation and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149-178.
Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorisation Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
Wiredu, K. (2011). The Humanities and the Idea of National Identity. In H. Lauer, N.A.A. Amfo, & J. A. Anderson (Eds.), Identity Meets Nationality: Voices from the Humanities, (pp. 1-17). Accra, Ghana: Sub-Saharan Publishers.
Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Liebhart, K. (2009). The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Yurikayani, N. L. P., Sosiowati, I. G. A. G., & Dewi, A. A. S. S. S. (2024). Grammatical Cohesive Devices in Taylor Swift’s Nyu 2022 Commencement Speech. VISA: Journal of Vision and Ideas, 4(3), 1331-1336.
Zufferey, S. (2020). Introduction to Corpus Linguistics. London: ISTE Ltd.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eric Antwi, Kwabena Sarfo Sarfo-Kantanka, Joseph Benjamin Archibald Afful
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe on the rights of others).
- they agree to license and copyright agreement.
All articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
