Perceptions of sexist humour on Kenyan stand-up comedy: Insights from the Churchill Show

Authors

  • Naftal Nyakundi Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology, Kenya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.51212

Keywords:

audience perception, critical discourse analysis, gender stereotype, Kenya, sexist humour, stand-up comedy

Abstract

This paper investigates how different audience demographics interpret verbal sexist humour on The Churchill Show, a leading Kenyan stand-up comedy program broadcast on TV47. Employing Norman Fairclough’s sociocultural approach to Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), the study delves into audience perceptions of humour that reflects gender biases, stereotypes, and power dynamics. The analysis draws on data collected through focus group discussions, where participants responded to eight selected excerpts of comedic content from nine episodes. The findings highlight diverse audience reactions, ranging from laughter and acceptance to unease and criticism, shaped by demographic factors such as age, gender, and cultural orientation. By analyzing these varied responses, the study sheds light on how sexist humour both reinforces and challenges prevailing gender narratives in Kenyan society. These insights contribute to broader discussions on the societal implications of humour and its role in shaping public attitudes toward gender.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. DeGruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110887969

Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and Redicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour. Sage Publications.

Chacha, L. (2017). A Sketch of Kiswahili Comic Discourse in Nairobi. Institut Franncais De Recherché en Afrique (IFRA).

Chilton, P. (1988). Linguistic Process in Sociocultural Practice. Columbia University Press.

Crawford, M. (1995). Sex differences in humour. Psychological Bulletin, 117 (1), 41-54.

Davies, C. (2008). The language of humor: A sociolinguistic perspective. Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. 2nd.Ed). London:Pearson Education Limited.

Ford, T.E., Boxer, C.F., Armstrong, J., & Edel, J (2008). More than “just a joke”: The prejudice-releasing function of sexist humour. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310022

Ford, T.E. (2000). Effects of sexist humor on tolerance of sexist events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1094–1107.

Ford, T. E., & Ferguson, M. A. (2004). Social consequences of disparagement humour: A prejudiced norm theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0801_5

Greenwood, D., & Isbell, L. M. (2002). Ambivalent sexism and the dumb blonde: Men's and women's reaction to sexist jokes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 341-350. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00089

Glick, P., Fiske, S.T., Swim, J.K. (2023). The Harmful Effects of Persisting Sexist Humour: A Psychological and Mental Healthy Perspective. Journal of Gender Studies, 15(2), 123-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2023.1843320

Hasinoff, A.A. (2015). Sexting panic: Rethinking criminalization, privacy, and consent. University of Illinois Press.

Holmes, J. (2000). Politeness, Power, and Provocation: How Humour Functions in The Workplace. Discourse Studies, 2(2), 159-185

Kuipers, G. (2009). Humour Styles and Symbolic Boundaries. Journal of Literary Theory, 3(2), 219-235.

La Fave, L., Haddad, J., & Maesen, W.A. (1976). Superiority, enhanced self-esteem, and perceived incongruity humour theory. Sociometry, 39 (1), 152-164.

Lafrance, M., & Vial, A.C. (2016). “Gender and humour: The state of the art.” The Psychology of Humour: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues, 139-160.

Martin, R.A. (2007). The Psychology of Humour: An Integrative Approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.

Meyer, J.C. (2000). Humour as a double-edged sword: Four Functions of Humour in Communication. Communication Theory, 10(3), 310-331.

Mills, S. (2008). Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Norrick, N.R. (2003). Issues in Conversational Joking. Journal of pragmatics, 35(9) 1333- 359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166 (02)00180-7

Okigbo, C., & Asemah, E. (2012). Humour in Nigerian Political Cartoons: A semiotic analysis. European scientific journal, 8(8), 51-67.

Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic Mechanisms of Humour. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.

Romero-Sanchez, M., Duran, M., Carretero-Dios, H., Megias, J.L., & Moya, M. (2009). Exposure to sexist humor and rape proclivity: The moderator effect of aversiveness. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12 (773-787).

Swim J.K., Mallet, R., & Stangor, C. (2001). Understanding subtle sexism: Detection and use of sexist language. Sex Roles, 45(9-10), 509-524.

Thomae, M., &Viki, G.T. (2013) Why did the woman cross the road? The effect of sexist humour on men's rape proclivity. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology, 7(3), 250-269.

Thomas, K., & Esses, V.M. (2004). “Individual differences in the perception of sexist humour: an examination of the role of sexist attitudes and gender.” Humour-International Journal of Humour Research, 17(4), 363-383.

Downloads

Published

24-02-2025

How to Cite

Nyakundi, N. (2025). Perceptions of sexist humour on Kenyan stand-up comedy: Insights from the Churchill Show. Linguistics Initiative, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.51212

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.