Analysis of American slang words in Whiplash movie
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.52336Keywords:
American slang, linguistic features, identity, vulgarity, verbal aggressionAbstract
This paper examines the linguistic and functional characteristics of American slang within the film script of Whiplash (2014), written by Damien Chazelle. It categorizes slang based on linguistic features and discusses their roles in portraying character relationship, emotional intensity, and group-based identity in a high-pressure music academy setting. The study finds that slang in Whiplash functions not just as informal language, but as a purposeful communicative strategy. It facilitates peer interaction, expresses strong emotion, and strengthen group identity, while also serving as a tool for social division, pressure, and control. These expressions reflect a range of linguistic features – such as ellipsis, rhythm, creativity, vulgarity, and ephemerality – that mirror the demanding environment of competitive jazz. Ultimately, the film demonstrates how slang can function as both a bonding mechanism and a form of domination, highlighting the powerful relationship between language, power, and identity.
Downloads
References
Adams, M. (2012). Slang: The people's Poetry. Oxford University Press.
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language.Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617881
Andersson, L.-G., & Trudgill, P. (1990). Bad Language.
Chapman, R. L. (1986). A New Dictionary of American Slang.
Coleman, J. (2012). The Life of Slang. Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches: Sage Publications.
Eble, C. (1996). Slang and sociability/C. Eble. L. and Chapel Hill: UNC Press Books.
Eble, C. C. (1973). Slang & sociability: in-group language among college students.
Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High.
Eric, P. (2004). Slang: Today and Yesterday. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
Halliday, M. A. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic. London Arnold.
Hornby, A. S., Cowie, A. P., Gimson, A. C., & Hornby, A. S. (1974). Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English (Vol. 1035): Oxford University Press.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns/Univ. In: of Pennsylvania Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics: Cambridge university press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813313
Manurung, H. A. D., Heriansyah, H., & Achmad, D. (2020). An Analysis Of Slang Terms In The “Deadpool” Movie. Research in English and Education Journal, 5(1), 39-45.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage.
Munthe, P. R., Arifin, M. B., & Setyowati, R. (2023). An Analysis of Slang Words in IT Movie. Ilmu Budaya: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Budaya, 7(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.30872/jbssb.v7i2.6663
Situmorang, R. K., & Herman, H. (2021). An Analysis of Slang Language Styles Used in Charlie's Angels Movie. Journal of English Educational Study (JEES), 4(1), 21-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/jees.v4i1.820
Spears, R. A. (1991). Dictionary of American slang and colloquial expressions: National Textbook.
Tubagus, N. B., Suharsih, S., & Hakim, R. (2021). A Morphological Analysis of Slang Words Used by Characters in “Ralph Breaks the Internet” Movie. Proceeding AISELT, 6(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33633/es.v4i01.4462
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics: Oxford University Press.
Zhou, Y., & Fan, Y. (2013). A sociolinguistic study of American slang. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(12), 2209-2214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.12.2209-2213
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ririn Sotyarini

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe on the rights of others).
- they agree to license and copyright agreement.
All articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.




