The Syntactic Complexity of Noun Phrases in Second Language Students’ Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.3174Keywords:
colleges of education, noun phrase, GhanaAbstract
Investigations on learners' writing have multiplied over the recent decades, but writings created by students of institutions of education are still mostly unstudied. This research looks into how noun phrases (NPs) were used in writings created by students at Ghanaian colleges of education (CoEs). Lu's (2010) three metrics for measuring overall NP complexity for text—a length-based metric of NP complexity, mean length of clause (MLC), and two specific NP complexity metrics—number of complex nominals per clause (CN/C) and number of complex nominals per T-Unit (CN/T)—were chosen and applied to a total of 318 texts written by Levels 100, 200, and 300 students from three colleges of education in Ghana. The results from the one-way ANOVA and its post hoc analysis showed a significant difference between Levels 100 and 300 students as well as between Levels 200 and 300 students in their use of complex noun phrases. Overall, Level 300 students significantly used more complex NPs than students in the other levels. It is recommended that in further studies, lexico-grammatical features such as relative clauses, prepositional phrases, and nominal clauses, should be analysed to assess complexity since academic language is a multifaceted entity which may be researched in various fields like SLA, applied linguistics, and language testing.
Downloads
References
Agor, J. T. (2018). Undergraduate writing in a second language context: Analysis of English intra-sentence issues. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 7(1), 32-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/gjl.v7i1.2
Alreck, P. L. & Settle, R. B. (1985). The survey research handbook. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (version 3.3.4) [Computer software]. Tokyo: Waseda University.
Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research. London: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Bamigbola, E. O. (2015). Complex sequence of the English nominal group. Sino-US English Teaching, 12(4), 271-281. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2015.04.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2015.04.005
Beers, S. F. & Nagy, W.E. (2009). Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22(2), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9107-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9107-5
Biber, D., Gray, B. & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristic of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45, 5-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Bulte, B. & Housen, A. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 23(4), 21-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.005
Bulté, B. & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In A Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 21-46). London: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.32.02bul
Elliott, T. (2019). Variation in use of the noun phrase as nominal premodifiers in advanced student writing across academic disciplines. Unpublished masters’ thesis, IOWA State University.
Gardner, S., Nesi, H. & Biber, D. (2018). Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 646-674. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity revisited: How far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes, 21(4), 385-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00028-X
Jucker, H. A. (1992). Social stylistic: Syntactic variation in British newspaper. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110851151
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164470030003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
Liu, L. & Li, L. (2016). Noun phrase complexity in EFL academic writing: A corpus-based study of post graduate academic writing. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 13(1), 4-48. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2016.13.1.4.48 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2016.13.1.4.48
Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4) 474-496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15.4.02lu
Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2015). Reflections on ‘researching and teaching Chinese as a foreign language’. Researching and Teaching Chinese as a Foreign Language, 1(1), 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/rtcfl.v1i1.27271
Obeng, J. (2012). Gender variation in the use of NP structures. Unpublished masters’ thesis. University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Ortega, L. (2003). Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492-518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492
Owusu, W. (2012). The Ghanaian media landscape: How unethical practices of journalists undermine progress. Oxford: Unpublished Master Thesis.
Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Salakpi, B. K. (2020). Investigating structural challenges in paragraphing in essays of student-teachers. A case of Mount Mary College of Education; Ghana. International Journal of Research and Scholarly Communication, 3(4), 20-37.
Sarantakos, S. (1998). Social research. London: Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14884-4
Strid, J. E. (2016). The linguistic complexity of English learners writing. US: China Education Review.
Wang, S. & Beckett, G. H. (2017). “My excellent college entrance examination achievement”: Noun phrase use of Chinese EFL students’ writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(2), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0802.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0802.07
William, C. (2011). Research methods. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 5(3), 65-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v5i3.2532
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S. & Kim, H. Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realize education’s promise. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Zabala, L. M. H. (2004). Complex noun phrases in ESL narratives: Structural and discourse properties. Unpublished master’s thesis. Canada: Simon Fraser University.
Zhu, W. (2004). Faculty review on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Clara Ofosua Frempong, Stella Akosua Kayi, Sitsofe Ganu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe on the rights of others).
- they agree to license and copyright agreement.
All articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
