A critical reflection on masculine language in Coates’ theory: A case study of female leaders’ speech in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.61397Keywords:
language, masculine, norm, gender, authority, leadershipAbstract
This study conducts a critical examination of masculine language features used by female leaders in the public sphere in Indonesia. Based on Coates' (2015) theory of masculinity, this research aims to analyze three main features of masculine language: swearing and taboo language, commands and directives, and questions. The method employed is a qualitative approach based on narrative and content analysis, with secondary data derived from speeches found on relevant YouTube channels. The use of swearing and taboo language serves to assert their dominance in certain situations, while the use of commands and directives demonstrates control and authority. Additionally, rhetorical questions, often associated with masculinity, are used to challenge rigid gender norms. This study shows that masculine language features are not exclusive to men but can also be utilized by women. This research opens new space for discussions about dynamic linguistic identities in social life, particularly in the context of female leadership.
Downloads
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2016). Imperatives and commands in Manambu. Oceanic Linguistics, 634–668.
Alsyouf, A. (2018). Hegemonic Masculinity in Archetypal African Novels. Informasi Kajian Ilmu Komunikasi, 48(2).
Artika, M. R., Sofilla, D., Handyanto, W. A., Nisa, K., & Rangkuti, R. (2024). Male and Female Language: Sociolinguistics in’Wolf Gold’WhatsApp Chat. Linguistics and ELT Journal, 12(2).
Baker, P., & Brookes, G. (2025). Masculinities and Language. Taylor & Francis.
Baxter, J. (2009). The language of female leadership. Springer.
Beeching, K., & Woodfield, H. (2015). Researching sociopragmatic variability: Perspectives from variational, interlanguage and contrastive pragmatics. Springer.
Blackledge, A. (2005). Discourse and power in a multilingual world.
Blackwood, E. (2001). Representing women: the politics of Minangkabau Adat writings. The Journal of Asian Studies, 60(1), 125–149.
Brannon, R., & David, D. (1976). The Male Sex Role: Our Culture’s Blueprint of Manhood and WhatIt’s Done for Us Lately. The Forty-Nine Percent Majority: The Male Sex Role. Eds. David, Deborah Sarah and Robert Brannon. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co, 12.
Bucholtz, M. (2014). The feminist foundations of language, gender, and sexuality research. The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 21–47.
Butler, J., & Trouble, G. (1990). Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Gender Trouble, 3(1), 3–17.
Cameron, D. (2020). Language and gender: Mainstreaming and the persistence of patriarchy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2020(263), 25–30.
Clark, M. (2004). Men, masculinities and symbolic violence in recent Indonesian cinema. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 35(1), 113–131.
Coates, J. (2015). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language. Routledge.
Cooley, C. H. (2017). Human nature and the social order. Routledge.
Crenshaw. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black femi nist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1, 139–167.
Crenshaw. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Standford Lawa Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Cruttenden. (1997). Intonation (second edition). Cambridge University Press.
Damayanti, M., Kemal, E., & Rahmat, W. (2021). Category, type and motive of swear words in pasa lauak, sungai barameh, lubuk begalung district in covid pandemi as language learning. Curricula: Journal of Teaching and Learning, 6(1), 25–32.
Dawson, N., & Hammer, J. H. (2020). No pain, no gains: Conformity to masculine norms, body dissatisfaction, and exercise dependence. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(3), 430.
Dwijayani, N. M., Beratha, N. L. S., & Sukarini, N. W. (2023). A Study of Gender Difference of Using Taboo Words in The Euphoria Series. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 27(342–352).
Edwards, K. E., & Jones, S. R. (2009). “ Putting my man face on”: A grounded theory of college men’s gender identity development. Journal of College Student Development, 50(2), 210–228.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Routledge.
Gordon, C., & Foucault, M. (1980). selected interviews and other writings 1972− 1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
Gottzén, L., Bjørnholt, M., and Boonzaier, F. (2020). Men, masculinities and intimate partner violence. Routledge.
Gottzén, L., Mellström, U., Shefer, T. and Grimbeek, M. (2020). Routledge international handbook of masculinity studies. Routledge.
Hermawan, F. F. (2017). Masculinity in Indonesian Popular Culture in the Early Era of the New Order Regime. Lingua Cultura, 11(1), 47–52.
Horan. (2013). “You taught me language; and my profit on’t/is, I know how to curse”: Cursing and swearing in foreign language learning. Language and Intercultural Communication,.
Ismail, S. F. S. (2014). In pursuit of Mr. Right: Constructed masculinities in Malay teen magazine. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 477–483.
Jespersen. (1922). Language, its Nature, Development and Origin. Allen and Unwin.
Jones. (2015). Black radical masculinities in American warfare: Reconfiguring resistance in the body of Muhammad Ali towards exile. NORMA: International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 10 (3-4)(265 280). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2015.1103961
Kerns, K. A., & Stevens, A. C. (1996). Parent-child attachment in late adolescence: Links to social relations and personality. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25(3), 323–342.
Kiesling, S. (2007). Men, masculinities, and language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(6), 653–673.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433.
Lakoff. (1975). Language and Woman’s Place. Harper and Row.
Levon, E. (2015). Integrating intersectionality in language, gender, and sexuality research. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(7), 295–308.
Liao, K. Y.-H., Shen, F. C., Cox, A. R., Miller, A. R., Sievers, B., & Werner, B. (2020). Asian American men’s body image concerns: A focus group study. Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 21(3), 333.
Logan, T. D. (2017). Economics, sexuality, and male sex work. Cambridge University Press.
Lush, B. R. (2002). Commands and directives: Powerful speech in the EFL classroom. วารสาร ศิลปศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัย ธรรมศาสตร์, 2(1), 98–107.
Meyra, K. A., Rahmat, W., & Putri, F. R. (2018). Allusion in Novel" 24 Jam Bersama Gaspar Sebuah Cerita Detektif" by Sabda Armandio Semantic Approach. Curricula: Journal of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 120–129.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publication.
Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness (Issue 17). Cambridge University Press.
Ochs. (1993). ‘Indexing gender’. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. CUP.
Rahmat, W., Lateh, N. H. M., & Kurniawan, Y. (2022). How Do the Women Control Their Language Facing Certain Condition? A Perspective of Psychopragmatics. International Journal of Language Education, 6(1), 36–45.
Rahmat, W., Putra, L. D., & Fitriyah, R. (2023). How do the ethnicity minangkabau male express their masculinity in language: A identity point of view. Culture and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X231201389
Ratna, N. K. (2010). Teori, Metode, dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Pusataka Pelajar.
Revita, I. (2021). I definitely mean what I say”: Conversational Implicature of Minangkabau Women in Indonesia. Asian EFL Journal, 7(1.3), 82–100.
Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 61–92.
Spender. (1980). Man Made Language. Routledge.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistik. Sanata Dharma University Press.
Sulistyati, M. (2024). Women’s Morals or Customary Panopticism? Re-examining the Sumbang Duo Baleh in Minangkabau, West Sumatra, Indonesia. JSW (Jurnal Sosiologi Walisongo), 8(2), 149–162.
Takeuchi, K., Honda, K., & Kubo, M. (1994). An interaction-based language and its typing system. International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Languages Europe, 398–413.
West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (2002). Accountability in action: the accomplishment of gender, race and class in a meeting of the University of California Board of Regents. Discourse & Society, 13(4), 537–563.
Wincana, G., Rahmat, W., & Tatalia, R. G. (2022). Linguistic tendencies of anorexia nervosa on social media users Facebook (pragmatic study). Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research, 2(1), 1–9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Libra Dui Putra, Daru Winarti, Wiwik Retno Handayani, Randi Saputra, Silvia Marni, Kamruzzman Khandoker

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe on the rights of others).
- they agree to license and copyright agreement.
All articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.




