Linguistic Challenges of Courtroom Interpretation in Ghana
A Survey Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53696/27753719.41122Keywords:
courtroom interpretation, challenges, bilingualism, GhanaAbstract
This paper presents the results of a survey on the linguistic challenges of courtroom interpretation in Ghana. It is part of a larger study on the challenges of courtroom interpreters. Specifically, the paper discusses the everyday linguistic challenges faced by courtroom interpreters, and the coping mechanisms deployed. Additionally, the paper makes proposals on ways that these challenges encountered by courtroom interpreters can be mitigated. In terms of findings, the paper shows that the main linguistic challenges include insufficient bilingual skills, terminological issues relating to legal jargon (legal terminology), terminology in specialized areas such as medical science, finance, economics, etc., measurement and quantities terms (e.g., money, fines, land, time, etc.), descriptive terms like color, height, etc., kinship terminology as well as speakers’ uses idiomatic expressions you are not familiar with. The paper notes that interpreters often use creative strategies like codemixing, omission of details, approximating color, and kinship terms, and seeking clarification through intervention to overcome these challenges. By way of recommendation, we propose the creation of glossaries in indigenous languages, collaboration with communities to identify and develop appropriate kinship terminology, the development of context-specific terminology, simplification of language, pre-session preparation, and continuous training and professional development.
Downloads
References
Anyidoho, A., & Dakubu, M. E. K. (2008). Ghana: Indigenous languages, English, and an emerging national identity. Language and National Identity in Africa, 141, 157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199286744.003.0008
Atintono, S. (2013). The semantics and grammar of positional verbs in Gurenɛ: A typological perspective. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
Atintono, S., & Nsoh, A. (2018). Inconsistent language policy and its implications for the quality of education in Ghana. Education for Life in Africa. Leiden: ASC, 82-99.
Dakubu, M. E. K. (2015). The Languages of Ghana. Routledge.
De Jongh, E. M. (1991). Foreign language interpreters in the courtroom: The case for linguistic and cultural proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 285-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05357.x
Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (Eds.). (2023). Ethnologue: Languages of the World (26th ed.). Dallas, Texas: SIL International.
Government of Ghana. (1992). Constitution of the Republic of Ghana
Hale, S. (2004). The discourse of court interpreting. The Discourse of Court Interpreting, 1-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.52
Hale, S. (2008). Controversies over the role of the court interpreter. Benjamins Translation Library, 76, 99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.76.06hal
Judicial Service of Ghana (2011) Interpreters Handbook.
Kaplan, C. D., Korf, D., & Sterk, C. (1987). Temporal and social contexts of heroin-using populations: An illustration of the snowball sampling technique. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9), 566-574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-198709000-00009
Kiguru, E. G. (2008). Strategies employed by court interpreters and categories of interpreter error in selected Kenyan courts. Unpublished MA Dissertation). Kenyatta University, Nairobi.
Kohn, K., & Kalina, S. (1996). The strategic dimension of interpreting. Meta, 41(1), 118-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/003333ar
Laster, K., & Taylor, V. L. (1994). Technocratic Multiculturalism: Lawyers Use Interpreters. Law Context: A Socio-Legal J., 12, 76.
Lee, J. (2009). Conflicting views on court interpreting examined through surveys of legal professionals and court interpreters. Interpreting, 11(1), 35-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.11.1.04lee
Morris, R. (1993). The interlingual interpreter—Cypher or intelligent participant?. Revue Internationale de Semiotique Juridique, 6(3), 271-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099836
Mikkelson, H. (1998). Towards a redefinition of the role of the court interpreter. Interpreting, 3(1), 21-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.3.1.02mik
Myers-Scotton, C. (2006). Natural codeswitching knocks on the laboratory door. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(2), 203-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002549
Nartowska, K. (2016). The role of the court interpreter: A powerless or powerful participant in criminal proceedings? The Interpreters' Newsletter, 20, 9-32
Philister, Y. & Mwangi, P. (2020) Linguistic challenges faced by the interpreter in presentation of litigants’ evidence in Kericho county, Kenya. International Journal of Management Studies and Social Science Research, 65-68.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Comfort Anafo, Kenneth Bodua-Mango, Prosper Teye Akortia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors certify that:
- if the manuscript is co-authored, they are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- the work described has not been formally published before in a registered ISSN or ISBN media, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, or thesis.
- it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- they secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere (it does not infringe on the rights of others).
- they agree to license and copyright agreement.
All articles published are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and other proprietary rights related to the article.
- Authors retain the right and are permitted to use the substance of the article in their own future works, including lectures and books.
- Authors grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post or self-archive their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
